↓ Skip to main content

A novel in silicoreverse-transcriptomics-based identification and blood-based validation of a panel of sub-type specific biomarkers in lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel in silicoreverse-transcriptomics-based identification and blood-based validation of a panel of sub-type specific biomarkers in lung cancer
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-s6-s5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debmalya Barh, Neha Jain, Sandeep Tiwari, John K Field, Elena Padin-Iruegas, Alvaro Ruibal, Rafael López, Michel Herranz, Antaripa Bhattacharya, Lucky Juneja, Cedric Viero, Artur Silva, Anderson Miyoshi, Anil Kumar, Kenneth Blum, Vasco Azevedo, Preetam Ghosh, Triantafillos Liloglou

Abstract

Lung cancer accounts for the highest number of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Early diagnosis significantly increases the disease-free survival rate and a large amount of effort has been expended in screening trials and the development of early molecular diagnostics. However, a gold standard diagnostic strategy is not yet available. Here, based on miRNA expression profile in lung cancer and using a novel in silico reverse-transcriptomics approach, followed by analysis of the interactome; we have identified potential transcription factor (TF) markers that would facilitate diagnosis of subtype specific lung cancer. A subset of seven TF markers has been used in a microarray screen and was then validated by blood-based qPCR using stage-II and IV non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Our results suggest that overexpression of HMGA1, E2F6, IRF1, and TFDP1 and downregulation or no expression of SUV39H1, RBL1, and HNRPD in blood is suitable for diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma sub-types of NSCLC. Here, E2F6 was, for the first time, found to be upregulated in NSCLC blood samples. The miRNA-TF-miRNA interaction based molecular mechanisms of these seven markers in NSCLC revealed that HMGA1 and TFDP1 play vital roles in lung cancer tumorigenesis. The strategy developed in this work is applicable to any other cancer or disease and can assist in the identification of potential biomarkers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 34%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 3 6%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,877
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,352
of 224,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#26
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.