↓ Skip to main content

Community perceptions of health insurance and their preferred design features: implications for the design of universal health coverage reforms in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community perceptions of health insurance and their preferred design features: implications for the design of universal health coverage reforms in Kenya
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-474
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Mulupi, Doris Kirigia, Jane Chuma

Abstract

Health insurance is currently being considered as a mechanism for promoting progress to universal health coverage (UHC) in many African countries. The concept of health insurance is relatively new in Africa, it is hardly well understood and remains unclear how it will function in countries where the majority of the population work outside the formal sector. Kenya has been considering introducing a national health insurance scheme (NHIS) since 2004. Progress has been slow, but commitment to achieve UHC through a NHIS remains. This study contributes to this process by exploring communities' understanding and perceptions of health insurance and their preferred designs features. Communities are the major beneficiaries of UHC reforms. Kenyans should understand the implications of health financing reforms and their preferred design features considered to ensure acceptability and sustainability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 242 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 58 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 24%
Social Sciences 34 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 5%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 68 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2013.
All research outputs
#12,886,769
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,287
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,428
of 212,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#75
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.