You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Delayed drainage versus autotransfusion drainage and routine drainage after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-799x-8-39 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuan Zhang, Zhi-jun Li, Yong-fa Zheng, Shi-qing Feng, Hui Li |
Abstract |
The purpose of this research is to compare the clinical results of different drainage methods in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,353,475
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#938
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,364
of 212,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.