You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Researching male circumcision for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea: a process that incorporates science, faith and culture
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-11-44 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachael Tommbe, David J MacLaren, Michelle L Redman-MacLaren, Tracie A Mafile’o, Lester Asugeni, William John H McBride |
Abstract |
Undertaking HIV research in the culturally diverse Pacific nation of Papua New Guinea (PNG) requires careful consideration of social, cultural and religious beliefs and practices. Here, we share a detailed description of culturally informed research processes and lessons learned from the first ever study undertaken on male circumcision for HIV prevention at a faith-based university in PNG. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 18% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 62 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 19% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 12 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
Psychology | 5 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,106,897
of 24,385,762 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#674
of 1,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,060
of 217,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,385,762 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.