You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A mammosphere formation RNAi screen reveals that ATG4A promotes a breast cancer stem-like phenotype
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bcr3576 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonas Wolf, Dyah Laksmi Dewi, Johannes Fredebohm, Karin Müller-Decker, Christa Flechtenmacher, Jörg D Hoheisel, Michael Boettcher |
| Abstract |
Breast cancer stem cells are suspected to be responsible for tumour recurrence, metastasis formation as well as chemoresistance. Consequently, great efforts have been made to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer stem cell maintenance. In order to study these rare cells in-vitro, they are typically enriched via mammosphere culture. Here we developed a mammosphere-based negative selection shRNAi screening system suitable to analyse the involvement of thousands of genes in the survival of cells with cancer stem cell properties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#1,655
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,524
of 224,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.