You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is the use of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improving implant positioning and function? A comparative study of 198 knees operated at a Norwegian district hospital
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-321 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gro Sævik Dyrhovden, Øystein Gøthesen, Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre, Anne Marie Fenstad, Tor Egil Sørås, Svein Halvorsen, Truls Jellestad, Ove Furnes |
Abstract |
There are few Scandinavian studies on the effect of computer assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), compared to conventional technique (CON), and there is little information on effects in pain and function scores. This retrospective study has evaluated the effects of CAOS on radiological parameters and pain, function and quality of life after primary TKA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 43 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 25% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2013.
All research outputs
#12,693,620
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,670
of 4,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,713
of 212,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#21
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.