You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost of behavior change communication channels of Manoshi -a maternal, neonatal and child health (MNCH) program in urban slums of Dhaka, Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-11-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bidhan Krishna Sarker, Sayem Ahmed, Noushin Islam, Jahangir AM Khan |
| Abstract |
The cost of behavior change communication (BCC) interventions has not been rigorously studied in Bangladesh. This study was conducted to assess the implementation costs of a BCC intervention in a maternal, neonatal and child health program (Manoshi) run by BRAC, which has been operating in the urban slums of Dhaka since 2007. The study estimates the costs of BCC tools per exposure among the different types of BCC channels: face-to-face, group counseling, and mass media. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 24% |
| Researcher | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#231
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,661
of 224,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.