↓ Skip to main content

Pre-existing chronic interstitial pneumonia is a poor prognostic factor of Goodpasture’s syndrome: a case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-existing chronic interstitial pneumonia is a poor prognostic factor of Goodpasture’s syndrome: a case report and review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1273-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroki Tashiro, Koichiro Takahashi, Yuki Ikeda, Saori Uchiumi, Makoto Fukuda, Miyazono Motoaki, Shinya Kimura, Naoko Sueoka-Aragane

Abstract

Goodpasture's syndrome is a rare disease that is characterized by rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. A 71-year-old Japanese man who had chronic interstitial pneumonia was diagnosed as having Goodpasture's syndrome. Both anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody and myeloperoxidase anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody were increased. Despite intensive treatments, including mechanical ventilation, he died from respiratory failure. Pathological findings at autopsy showed rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in his kidneys, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, hyaline membranes, and fibroblastic foci in his lungs. The cause of death was diagnosed as respiratory failure as a result of diffuse alveolar damage induced by a combination of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage and exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia. We report a case of Goodpasture's syndrome complicated with pre-existing chronic interstitial pneumonia and positive myeloperoxidase anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody. We reviewed six similar cases reported in the literature and concluded that Goodpasture's syndrome with pre-existing interstitial pneumonia and myeloperoxidase anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody is related to a poor prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Lecturer 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 4 27%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#18,541,268
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,276
of 3,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,821
of 310,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#50
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,939 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.