You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and evaluation of a crosswalk between the SF-36 physical functioning scale and Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in rheumatoid arthritis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-199 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter M ten Klooster, Martijn AH Oude Voshaar, Barbara Gandek, Matthias Rose, Jakob B Bjorner, Erik Taal, Cees AW Glas, Piet LCM van Riel, Mart AFJ van de Laar |
Abstract |
The SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) are the most frequently used instruments for measuring self-reported physical function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to develop a crosswalk between scores on the PF-10 and HAQ-DI in RA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 19% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 27% |
Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 39% |
Psychology | 11 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,372
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,745
of 223,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#24
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.