↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of depression and associated risk factors among persons with type-2 diabetes mellitus without a prior psychiatric history: a cross-sectional study in clinical settings in urban Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of depression and associated risk factors among persons with type-2 diabetes mellitus without a prior psychiatric history: a cross-sectional study in clinical settings in urban Nepal
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-309
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiran Niraula, Brandon A Kohrt, Meerjady Sabrina Flora, Narbada Thapa, Shirin Jahan Mumu, Rahul Pathak, Babill Stray-Pedersen, Pukar Ghimire, Bhawana Regmi, Elizabeth K MacFarlane, Roshni Shrestha

Abstract

Diabetes is a growing health problem in South Asia. Despite an increasing number of studies exploring causal pathways between diabetes and depression in high-income countries (HIC), the pathway between the two disorders has received limited attention in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). The aim of this study is to investigate the potential pathway of diabetes contributing to depression, to assess the prevalence of depression, and to evaluate the association of depression severity with diabetes severity. This study uses a clinical sample of persons living with diabetes sequelae without a prior psychiatric history in urban Nepal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
India 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 251 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 8%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 69 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 29%
Psychology 31 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 87 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,354,532
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,851
of 4,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,219
of 211,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#80
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.