↓ Skip to main content

Sex-for-Crack exchanges: associations with risky sexual and drug use niches in an urban Canadian city

Overview of attention for article published in Harm Reduction Journal, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex-for-Crack exchanges: associations with risky sexual and drug use niches in an urban Canadian city
Published in
Harm Reduction Journal, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7517-10-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Putu Duff, Mark Tyndall, Jane Buxton, Ruth Zhang, Thomas Kerr, Kate Shannon

Abstract

While crack cocaine has been associated with elevated sexual risks and transmission of HIV/STIs, particularly in the context of street-based sex work, few empirical studies have examined correlates of direct sex-for-crack exchanges. This study longitudinally examined the correlates of sex-for-crack exchanges and associated effects on sexual risk outcomes among street-based female sex workers (SW) who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Other 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Social Sciences 13 15%
Psychology 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#2,334,220
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#363
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,653
of 224,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.