You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Micronutrients supplementation and nutritional status in cognitively impaired elderly persons: a two-month open label pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-148 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine AF von Arnim, Stephanie Dismar, Cornelia S Ott-Renzer, Nathalie Noeth, Albert C Ludolph, Hans K Biesalski |
| Abstract |
Malnutrition is a widespread problem in elderly people and is associated with cognitive decline. However, interventional studies have produced ambiguous results. For this reason, we wanted to determine the effect of micronutrient supplementation on blood and tissue levels and on general nutritional status in persons with mild or moderate cognitive impairment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#12,573,617
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#956
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,250
of 211,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.