↓ Skip to main content

Naturopaths practice behaviour: provision and access to information on complementary and alternative medicines

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Naturopaths practice behaviour: provision and access to information on complementary and alternative medicines
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2005
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-5-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Smith, Karen Martin, Elizabeth Hotham, Susan Semple, Geraldine Bloustien, Deepa Rao

Abstract

The increasing use of complementary and alternative medicines in Australia has generated concern regarding the information on these products available to both healthcare providers and the public. The aim of this study was to examine the practice behaviours of naturopaths in relation to both the provision of and access to information on complementary and alternative medicines (CAM).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 4%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Other 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,191,906
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,174
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,927
of 57,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.