↓ Skip to main content

Looks like smoking, is it smoking?: Children’s perceptions of cigarette-like nicotine delivery systems, smoking and cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Harm Reduction Journal, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Looks like smoking, is it smoking?: Children’s perceptions of cigarette-like nicotine delivery systems, smoking and cessation
Published in
Harm Reduction Journal, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7517-10-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julienne Faletau, Marewa Glover, Vili Nosa, Fiona Pienaar

Abstract

Alternative cigarette-like nicotine delivery systems have been met with diverse opinions. One concern has been for the effect on children. We investigate whether children can differentiate tobacco cigarette smoking from use of a nicotine inhaler and electronic cigarette. Their opinions on these devices was also of interest.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 13 13%
Other 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 25 25%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 23%
Psychology 18 18%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 19 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#926,302
of 21,828,043 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#146
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,638
of 306,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,828,043 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.