↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: ‘Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and conceptual framework’

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: ‘Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and conceptual framework’
Published in
Implementation Science, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13012-016-0415-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliet Iwelunmor, Sarah Blackstone, Dorice Veira, Ucheoma Nwaozuru, Collins Airhihenbuwa, Davison Munodawafa, Ezekiel Kalipeni, Antar Jutal, Donna Shelley, Gbenga Ogedegbe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,524,541
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,248
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,546
of 299,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#38
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.