↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the rapid assessment procedure for loiasis (RAPLOA) in the democratic republic of Congo

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the rapid assessment procedure for loiasis (RAPLOA) in the democratic republic of Congo
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-5-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Wanji, Dowo O Akotshi, Maurice N Mutro, Floribert Tepage, Tony O Ukety, Peter J Diggle, Jan H Remme

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,809,112
of 23,700,294 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,915
of 5,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,610
of 251,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#14
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,700,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.