You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Web-based self-management with and without coaching for type 2 diabetes patients in primary care: design of a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Endocrine Disorders, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6823-13-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael van Vugt, Maartje de Wit, Steven H Hendriks, Yvonne Roelofsen, Henk JG Bilo, Frank J Snoek |
| Abstract |
Self-management is recognized as the cornerstone of overall diabetes management. Web-based self-management programs have the potential of supporting type 2 diabetes patients with managing their diabetes and reducing the workload for the care provider, where the addition of online coaching could improve patient motivation and reduce program attrition. This study aims to test the hypothesis that a web-based self-management program with coaching will prove more effective on improving patient self-management behavior and clinical outcome measures than a web-based self-management program without coaching. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 25% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,182,545
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#334
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,662
of 187,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.