You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phenotypical variation within 22 families with Pompe disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-8-182 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephan C A Wens, Carin M van Gelder, Michelle E Kruijshaar, Juna M de Vries, Nadine A M E van der Beek, Arnold J J Reuser, Pieter A van Doorn, Ans T van der Ploeg, Esther Brusse |
| Abstract |
Pompe disease has a broad clinical spectrum, in which the phenotype is partially explained by the genotype. The aim of this study was to describe phenotypical variation among siblings with non-classic Pompe disease. We hypothesized that siblings and families with the same genotype share more similar phenotypes than the total population of non-classic Pompe patients, and that this might reveal genotype-phenotype correlations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,443,738
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#841
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,644
of 315,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.