You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Test-retest reliability of the eating disorder examination-questionnaire (EDE-Q) in a college sample
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Eating Disorders, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2050-2974-1-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer S Rose, Adin Vaewsorn, Francine Rosselli-Navarra, G Terence Wilson, Ruth Striegel Weissman |
| Abstract |
The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q), a widely used self-report instrument, is often used for measuring change in eating disorder symptoms over the course of treatment. However, limited data exist about test-retest reliability, particularly for men. The current study evaluated EDE-Q 7-day test-retest reliability in male (n = 47) and female (n = 44) undergraduate students together and separately by gender. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 47% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,163,835
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#539
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,370
of 302,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.