You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The success (or not) of HUGO nomenclature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, May 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2006-7-5-402 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Javier Tamames, Alfonso Valencia |
Abstract |
Current usage of gene nomenclature is ambiguous and impairs the efficient handling of scientific information. Therefore it is important to propose guidelines to deal with this problem. This study attempts to evaluate the success of HUGO nomenclature for human genes. The results indicate that HUGO guidelines are not supported by the scientific community. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 10% |
United States | 4 | 10% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 30% |
Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
Professor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 55% |
Computer Science | 4 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,001
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,623
of 84,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.