Title |
International consensus (ICON) on: clinical consequences of mite hypersensitivity, a global problem
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Allergy Organization Journal, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40413-017-0145-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mario Sánchez-Borges, Enrique Fernandez-Caldas, Wayne R. Thomas, Martin D. Chapman, Bee Wah Lee, Luis Caraballo, Nathalie Acevedo, Fook Tim Chew, Ignacio J. Ansotegui, Leili Behrooz, Wanda Phipatanakul, Roy Gerth van Wijk, Demoly Pascal, Nelson Rosario, Motohiro Ebisawa, Mario Geller, Santiago Quirce, Susanne Vrtala, Rudolf Valenta, Markus Ollert, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Moises A. Calderón, Charles S. Barnes, Adnan Custovic, Suwat Benjaponpitak, Arnaldo Capriles-Hulett |
Abstract |
Since mite allergens are the most relevant inducers of allergic diseases worldwide, resulting in significant morbidity and increased burden on health services, the International Collaboration in Asthma, Allergy and Immunology (iCAALL), formed by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI), the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI), the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), and the World Allergy Organization (WAO), has proposed to issue an International Consensus (ICON) on the clinical consequences of mite hypersensitivity. The objectives of this document are to highlight aspects of mite biology that are clinically relevant, to update the current knowledge on mite allergens, routes of sensitization, the genetics of IgE responses to mites, the epidemiologic aspects of mite hypersensitivity, the clinical pictures induced by mites, the diagnosis, specific immunotherapeutic approaches, and prevention. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 10 | 27% |
Romania | 4 | 11% |
Argentina | 2 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 70% |
Scientists | 6 | 16% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
Researcher | 19 | 10% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Professor | 12 | 6% |
Other | 43 | 22% |
Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
Other | 33 | 17% |
Unknown | 66 | 34% |