↓ Skip to main content

Implementing an electronic learning management system for an Ophthalmology residency program

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing an electronic learning management system for an Ophthalmology residency program
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12909-016-0828-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas R. Mahoney, Michael V. Boland, Pradeep Y. Ramulu, Divya Srikumaran

Abstract

Medical educators, residents and administrators have increasing access to a large quantity of electronic resources. This content can augment and improve our teaching methods but can be difficult to consolidate and present. A multitude of electronic learning management systems are available to help organize and serve this content though never with small residency programs as the target userbase. As our residency program in Ophthalmology looked to consolidate our electronic resources and update our education methods, we evaluated and built an electronic learning management platform. Faculty were interviewed to determine features they would find useful in curriculum management system and then various systems were investigated for features, cost and ease of use. Our solution has been both cost-effective and successful. Resident satisfaction is high and faculty utilization has been increasing. We present many customizations that increased success. Consideration of the specific needs of a program is paramount to choosing a cost effective solution that will be well received.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Master 4 11%
Librarian 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 34%
Computer Science 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,414,746
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#3,172
of 3,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#351,203
of 417,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#49
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.