You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Influence of anthropometric factors on tumour biological characteristics of colorectal cancer in men and women: a cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-11-293 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jenny Brändstedt, Sakarias Wangefjord, Signe Borgquist, Björn Nodin, Jakob Eberhard, Jonas Manjer, Karin Jirström |
Abstract |
Obesity is a well established risk factor of colorectal cancer (CRC), but how body size influences risk of colorectal cancer defined by key molecular alterations remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the relationship between height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist- and hip circumference, waist-hip ratio (WHR) and risk of CRC according to expression of beta-catenin, cyclin D1, p53 and microsatellite instability status of the tumours in men and women, respectively. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Taiwan | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2013.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,335
of 4,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,809
of 315,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#29
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.