You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lower suicide intention in patients with personality disorders admitted for deliberate self-poisoning than in patients with other diagnoses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of General Psychiatry, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12991-017-0145-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T. K. Grimholt, D. Jacobsen, O. R. Haavet, Ø. Ekeberg |
| Abstract |
People with deliberate self-poisoning and personality disorders are in increased risk for suicide. Intention and psychiatric features are important factors in a psychiatric evaluation and for planning aftercare. Patients admitted to medical departments after deliberate self-poisoning were studied (n = 117). Patients with personality disorder according to (ICD-10, F.60-69) were compared to patients with affective disorders, substance use disorders, and unknown psychiatric diagnosis on Beck Suicide Intention Scale (SIS), Beck Suicide Ideation Scale (BSI), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The mean suicide intention score (SIS) was significantly lower among patients with personality disorders compared with patients with other psychiatric diagnoses 10.2 (95% CI 8.1-12.4) vs. 14.6 (95% CI 12.7-16.4) (p = 0.040). The hopelessness scores (BHS) were significantly higher among patients with personality disorders 13.0 (95% CI 10.9-15.2) compared with patients with affective disorders 8.2 (95% CI 6.1-10.3) and substance use disorders 9.9 (95% CI 5.2-14.6) (p = 0.0014) and unknown psychiatric diagnoses 10.6 (95% CI 9.1-12.2). There were no significant differences between the groups on suicide ideation (BSI) and depression (BDI). Although patients with personality disorders had lower suicide intention compared to patients with other psychiatric diagnoses, they reported significantly more hopelessness. This distinction is an important implication in the clinical assessment and planning of further treatment of DSP patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Librarian | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,374,110
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#215
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,499
of 311,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.