↓ Skip to main content

Exploring differences in Canadian adult men and women with Diabetes management: results from the Canadian Community Health Survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring differences in Canadian adult men and women with Diabetes management: results from the Canadian Community Health Survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret De Melo, Eric de Sa, Enza Gucciardi

Abstract

Over 2 million Canadians are known to have diabetes. In addition to the economic burden placed on the healthcare system, the human cost associated with diabetes poses a heavy burden on those living with diabetes. The literature shows that apparent differences exist in diabetes complications and diabetes management between men and women. How self-care management and utilization of health services differ by sex is not clearly understood.The purpose of this study was to explore sex differences in diabetes self-care and medical management in the Canadian population, using a nationally representative sample.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 20%
Psychology 9 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2014.
All research outputs
#5,660,958
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,627
of 14,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,435
of 301,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#104
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.