↓ Skip to main content

Does PRP enhance bone integration with grafts, graft substitutes, or implants? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does PRP enhance bone integration with grafts, graft substitutes, or implants? A systematic review
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice Roffi, Giuseppe Filardo, Elizaveta Kon, Maurilio Marcacci

Abstract

Several bone implants are applied in clinical practice, but none meets the requirements of an ideal implant. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an easy and inexpensive way to obtain growth factors in physiologic proportions that might favour the regenerative process. The aim of this review is to analyse clinical studies in order to investigate the role of PRP in favouring bone integration of graft, graft substitutes, or implants, and to identify the materials for which the additional use of PRP might be associated with superior osseo- and soft tissues integration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Other 14 9%
Other 42 27%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Chemistry 6 4%
Materials Science 5 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2013.
All research outputs
#13,082,701
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,738
of 4,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,231
of 305,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#21
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,130 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.