You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence of the shifting baseline syndrome in ethnobotanical research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-9-75 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalia Hanazaki, Dannieli Firme Herbst, Mel Simionato Marques, Ina Vandebroek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 8% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 204 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 50 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,506,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#158
of 796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,991
of 228,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.