You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
EM for phylogenetic topology reconstruction on nonhomogeneous data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-14-132 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Esther Ibáñez-Marcelo, Marta Casanellas |
Abstract |
The reconstruction of the phylogenetic tree topology of four taxa is, still nowadays, one of the main challenges in phylogenetics. Its difficulties lie in considering not too restrictive evolutionary models, and correctly dealing with the long-branch attraction problem. The correct reconstruction of 4-taxon trees is crucial for making quartet-based methods work and being able to recover large phylogenies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 29% |
Norway | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
Librarian | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 36% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,896,932
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,815
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,846
of 242,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#29
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.