↓ Skip to main content

A feasibility study examining the effect on lung cancer diagnosis of offering a chest X-ray to higher-risk patients with chest symptoms: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A feasibility study examining the effect on lung cancer diagnosis of offering a chest X-ray to higher-risk patients with chest symptoms: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-405
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher N Hurt, Kirsty Roberts, Trevor K Rogers, Gareth O Griffiths, Kerry Hood, Hayley Prout, Annmarie Nelson, Jim Fitzgibbon, Allan Barham, Emma Thomas-Jones, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Seow Tien Yeo, William Hamilton, Angela Tod, Richard D Neal

Abstract

In order to improve lung cancer survival in the UK, a greater proportion of resectable cancers must be diagnosed. It is likely that resectability rates would be increased by more timely diagnosis. Aside from screening, the only way of achieving this is to reduce the time to diagnosis in symptomatic cancers. Currently, lung cancers are mainly diagnosed by general practitioners (GPs) using the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for urgent referral for chest X-ray, which recommend urgent imaging or referral for patients who have one of a number of chest symptoms for more than 3 weeks. We are proposing to expand this recommendation to include one of a number of chest symptoms of any duration in higher-risk patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Master 8 16%
Other 3 6%
Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Psychology 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 32%