You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Novel method using hybrid markers: development of an approach for pulmonary measurement of multi-walled carbon nanotubes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6673-8-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Makoto Ohnishi, Hirofumi Yajima, Tatsuya Kasai, Yumi Umeda, Masahiro Yamamoto, Seigo Yamamoto, Hirokazu Okuda, Masaaki Suzuki, Tomoshi Nishizawa, Shoji Fukushima |
| Abstract |
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT)s are suspected to induce pulmonary and pleural cancers due to their asbestos-like configurations. Therefore, accurate measurement of inhaled nanotubes in target organs is crucial for assessing cancer risk. Conventionally, nanotubes are measured after combustion at high temperature for conversion into CO2; however, the sensitivity is poor and the method lacks versatility. We have therefore developed a novel approach using hybrid markers for nanotube analysis, featuring high sensitivity and the capacity to conduct repeated analyses. The method involves adsorption of markers to nanotubes, followed by their desorption and assessment by means of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#210
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,939
of 224,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.