You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-7-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trine S Bergmo |
| Abstract |
Telemedicine has been advocated as an effective means to provide health care services over a distance. Systematic information on costs and consequences has been called for to support decision-making in this field. This paper provides a review of the quality, validity and generalisability of economic evaluations in telemedicine. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 161 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
| Researcher | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 23% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,144,341
of 25,847,449 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#254
of 554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,785
of 109,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,847,449 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them