You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chromatin signatures at transcriptional start sites separate two equally populated yet distinct classes of intergenic long noncoding RNAs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-11-r131 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana C Marques, Jim Hughes, Bryony Graham, Monika S Kowalczyk, Doug R Higgs, Chris P Ponting |
| Abstract |
Mammalian transcriptomes contain thousands of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). Some lncRNAs originate from intragenic enhancers which, when active, behave as alternative promoters producing transcripts that are processed using the canonical signals of their host gene. We have followed up this observation by analyzing intergenic lncRNAs to determine the extent to which they might also originate from intergenic enhancers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 32% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 12 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 29% |
| Researcher | 56 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
| Professor | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 73 | 37% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,839,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,183
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,603
of 320,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#47
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.