You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cluster randomized controlled trial of a psycho-educational intervention for people with a family history of depression for use in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-325 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bettina Meiser, Peter R Schofield, Lyndal Trevena, Alex Wilde, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Judy Proudfoot, Michelle Peate, Timothy Dobbins, Helen Christensen, Kerry A Sherman, Janan Karatas, Philip B Mitchell |
| Abstract |
The strongest risk factor for depression is having a family history of the condition. Many individuals with a family history of depression are concerned about their personal risk for depression and report unmet educational and psychological support needs. No supportive and/or educational interventions are currently available that target this group of individuals. In this study we will develop and evaluate the first online psycho-educational intervention targeted to individuals with a family history of depression. Genetic risk information and evidence-rated information on preventive strategies for depression will be provided to such individuals in a general practice setting. The intervention will also incorporate a risk assessment tool. The content and delivery of the intervention will be pilot-tested. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 59 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 89 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 67 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,048,906
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,689
of 4,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,200
of 307,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#53
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.