↓ Skip to main content

Long-term follow-up after stereotactic radiosurgery of intracanalicular acoustic neurinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term follow-up after stereotactic radiosurgery of intracanalicular acoustic neurinoma
Published in
Radiation Oncology, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13014-017-0805-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Rueß, Lea Pöhlmann, Stefan Grau, Christina Hamisch, Alexandra Hellerbach, Harald Treuer, Martin Kocher, Maximilian I. Ruge

Abstract

The management of solely intracanalicular acoustic neurinoma (iAN) includes observation, microsurgical resection and radiation therapy. Treatment goals are long-term tumor control, hearing preservation and concurrently low side-effects. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has evolved as an alternative first-line treatment for small AN. Here we report about the long-term follow-up of a unique cohort of patients with iAN after LINAC or Cyberknife® based SRS. In this single center retrospective analysis, we included all patients with iAN who underwent single session LINAC or Cyberknife® based SRS between 1993 and 2015, and who had a minimum follow-up period of six weeks. Patient data were analyzed in terms of radiological and clinical tumor control (no further treatment necessary), subjective preservation of serviceable hearing, objective change in pure tone averages (PTA), and adverse events rated by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; v4.03). Forty-nine patients (f/m = 21/28, median age 54 ± 12, range 20-77 years) were identified. Mean tumor volumes were 0.24 ± 0.12 cm(3) (range, 0.1-0.68 cm(3)), the mean marginal dose was 12.6 ± 0.6 Gy (range, 11.0-14.0 Gy) and the prescription isodose was 75 ± 7.4% (range, 47-86%). Mean follow-up time was 65 months (range, 4-239 months). Radiological tumor control was 100% during further follow-up. 17 (35%) out of 49 patients had lost serviceable hearing prior to SRS. Those with preserved serviceable hearing remained stable in 78% (n = 25/32) at the last follow-up (LFU). The median PTA (n = 16) increased from 25.6 dB prior to SRS to 43.8 dB at LFU. Mild adverse events were observed temporarily in two patients (4%): one with CTCAE grade 1 facial nerve disorder after 3 months, resolving three months later, and one with CTCAE grade 2 facial muscle weakness resolving after 12 months. Three patients described permanent mild symptoms CTCAE grade 1 without limiting daily life (facial weakness n = 1, vertigo n = 2). SRS for iAN shows long-term reliable tumor control with a high rate of hearing preservation without considerable permanent side effects, and can be proposed as a safe and effective treatment alternative to microsurgical resection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 35%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,542,806
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,427
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,392
of 309,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.