↓ Skip to main content

Detection of Brucella abortus DNA and RNA in different stages of development of the sucking louse Haematopinus tuberculatus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of Brucella abortus DNA and RNA in different stages of development of the sucking louse Haematopinus tuberculatus
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-9-236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianluca Neglia, Vincenzo Veneziano, Esterina De Carlo, Giorgio Galiero, Giorgia Borriello, Matteo Francillo, Giuseppe Campanile, Luigi Zicarelli, Laura Manna

Abstract

Brucellosis is considered the world's most widespread zoonotic infection. It causes abortion and sterility in livestock leading to serious economic losses and has even more serious medical impact in humans, since it can be a trigger to more than 500,000 infections per year worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of Haematopinus tuberculatus, a louse that can parasitize several ruminants, as a new host of brucellosis. Louse specimens were collected from seropositive and seronegative water buffaloes and divided in 3 developmental stages: adults, nymphs and nits. All samples were separately screened for Brucella spp. DNA and RNA detection by Real Time PCR. In particular, primers and probes potentially targeting the 16S rRNA and the Brucella Cell Surface 31 kDalton Protein (bcsp31) genes were used for Real Time PCR and buffalo β actin was used as a housekeeping gene to quantify host DNA in the sample. A known amount of B. abortus purified DNA was utilized for standard curve preparation and the target DNA amount was divided by the housekeeping gene amount to obtain a normalized target value. A further molecular characterization was performed for Brucella strain typing and genotyping by the Bruce-ladder, AMOS-PCR and MLVA assays. Data were statistically analysed by ANOVA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 33%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#2,610
of 3,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,775
of 320,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#40
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.