You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The new nordic diet – consumer expenditures and economic incentives estimated from a controlled intervention
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1114 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jørgen Dejgård Jensen, Sanne Kellebjerg Poulsen |
Abstract |
Several studies suggest that a healthy diet with high emphasis on nutritious, low-energy components such as fruits, vegetables, and seafood tends to be more costly for consumers. Derived from the ideas from the New Nordic Cuisine--and inspired by the Mediterranean diet, the New Nordic Diet (NND) has been developed as a palatable, healthy and sustainable diet based on products from the Nordic region. The objective of the study is to investigate economic consequences for the consumers of the NND, compared with an Average Danish Diet (ADD). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 102 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 12% |
Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 38 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 43 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,102,908
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,924
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,617
of 313,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#175
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.