You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phytochemical, toxicological and antimicrobial evaluation of lawsonia inermis extracts against clinical isolates of pathogenic bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-0711-12-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iram Gull, Maria Sohail, Muhammad Shahbaz Aslam, Muhammad Amin Athar |
| Abstract |
The emerging resistance of pathogen against the currently available antimicrobial agents demands the search of new antimicrobial agents. The use of medicinal plants as natural substitute is the paramount area of research to overwhelm the drug resistance of infectious agents. Scientists have not made enough effort on the evaluation of safety of medicinal plant yet. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,379,838
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#68
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,379
of 320,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.