You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Performance of two rapid diagnostic tests for malaria diagnosis at the China-Myanmar border area
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-12-73 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juan Yan, Nana Li, Xu Wei, Peipei Li, Zhenjun Zhao, Lili Wang, Siying Li, Xiaomei Li, Ying Wang, Shuying Li, Zhaoqing Yang, Bin Zheng, Guofa Zhou, Guiyun Yan, Liwang Cui, Yaming Cao, Qi Fan |
Abstract |
Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have become an essential tool in the contemporary malaria control and management programmes in the world. This study aims to evaluate the performance of two commonly used RDTs for malaria diagnosis in the China-Myanmar border area. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Thailand | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
Researcher | 11 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,772,416
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#907
of 5,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,799
of 192,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#19
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.