↓ Skip to main content

Continuous diphenhydramine infusion and imatinib for KIT-D816V-negative mast cell activation syndrome: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous diphenhydramine infusion and imatinib for KIT-D816V-negative mast cell activation syndrome: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1278-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faizan Malik, Naveed Ali, Syed Imran Mustafa Jafri, Ali Ghani, Mohsin Hamid, Margot Boigon, Christian Fidler

Abstract

We present the first full case report of the treatment of mast cell activation syndrome with continuous diphenhydramine infusion, which resulted in the improvement of anaphylactic reactions and a decrease in hospital readmission. Furthermore, the patient received imatinib in the absence of the KIT-D816V mutation, which led to further improvement of quality of life. Currently, we are trying to wean this patient off diphenhydramine; if successful, this attempt will represent the first reported case. An 18-year-old white girl presented with a flare of mast cell activation syndrome and received epinephrine and steroids. She had failed multiple previous therapies, and her quality of life was affected due to two to three flares/week. She was started on continuous diphenhydramine infusion and imatinib, which led to a decrease in hospital admissions and marked improvement in her quality of life. Continuous diphenhydramine infusion can provide promising outcomes following the failure of intermittent antihistamine dosing in patients with severe mast cell activation syndrome. Initiating continuous diphenhydramine infusion may be helpful in an intensive care setting when the patient is particularly prone to anaphylaxis and/or the resources needed to manage anaphylaxis are not available outside the intensive care unit. Furthermore, imatinib provides benefits in KIT-D816V-negative mast cell disorders due to other unknown mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 15 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,782,494
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,319
of 4,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,019
of 310,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#49
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,003 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.