You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of a stratified group intervention using the STarTBack screening tool in patients with LBP - a non randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan E Murphy, Catherine Blake, Camillus K Power, Brona M Fullen |
| Abstract |
Low back pain (LBP) is costly to society and improving patient outcomes is a priority. Stratifying LBP patients into more homogenous groups is advocated to improve patient outcome. The STarT Back tool, a prognostic screening tool has demonstrated efficacy and greater cost effectiveness in physiotherapy settings. The management of LBP patients in groups is common but to date the utility of the STarT Back tool in group settings has not been explored. The aim of this study is to determine if the implementation of 'stratified care' when delivered in a group setting will lead to significantly better physical and psychological outcomes and greater cost effectiveness in LBP patients compared to a bestcare historical control group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 12% |
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 14% |
| Unknown | 77 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 18% |
| Psychology | 17 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 91 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,169,303
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,398
of 4,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,436
of 310,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#25
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.