You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Breast cancer in lesbians and bisexual women: systematic review of incidence, prevalence and risk studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1127 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine Meads, David Moore |
Abstract |
The UK Parliamentary Enquiry and USA Institute of Medicine state that lesbians may be at a higher risk of breast cancer but there is insufficient information. Lesbians and bisexual (LB) women have behavioural risk-factors at higher rates compared to heterosexuals such as increased alcohol intake and higher stress levels. Conversely, breast cancer rates are higher in more affluent women yet income levels in LB women are relatively low. This systematic review investigated all evidence on whether there is, or likely to be, higher rates of breast cancer in LB women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Brazil | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
Researcher | 17 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 15% |
Psychology | 16 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#959,716
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,042
of 17,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,925
of 322,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#17
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.