↓ Skip to main content

Breast cancer in lesbians and bisexual women: systematic review of incidence, prevalence and risk studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breast cancer in lesbians and bisexual women: systematic review of incidence, prevalence and risk studies
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Meads, David Moore

Abstract

The UK Parliamentary Enquiry and USA Institute of Medicine state that lesbians may be at a higher risk of breast cancer but there is insufficient information. Lesbians and bisexual (LB) women have behavioural risk-factors at higher rates compared to heterosexuals such as increased alcohol intake and higher stress levels. Conversely, breast cancer rates are higher in more affluent women yet income levels in LB women are relatively low. This systematic review investigated all evidence on whether there is, or likely to be, higher rates of breast cancer in LB women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Social Sciences 17 15%
Psychology 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#959,716
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,042
of 17,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,925
of 322,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#17
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.