You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
FISH and tips: a large scale analysis of automated versus manual scoring for sperm aneuploidy detection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Basic and Clinical Andrology, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2051-4190-23-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guillaume Martinez, Pierre Gillois, Marine Le Mitouard, Rémy Borye, Camille Esquerré-Lamare, Véronique Satre, Louis Bujan, Sylviane Hennebicq |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 33% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,741,509
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#31
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,369
of 320,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them