↓ Skip to main content

Is early detection of abused children possible?: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of abused children

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is early detection of abused children possible?: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of the identification of abused children
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-13-202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marion Bailhache, Valériane Leroy, Pascal Pillet, Louis-Rachid Salmi

Abstract

Early detection of abused children could help decrease mortality and morbidity related to this major public health problem. Several authors have proposed tools to screen for child maltreatment. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the evidence on accuracy of tools proposed to identify abused children before their death and assess if any were adapted to screening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 223 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Other 14 6%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 59 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 29%
Psychology 33 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 72 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,493,896
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#987
of 3,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,171
of 323,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#12
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.