↓ Skip to main content

Household catastrophic medical expenses in eastern China: determinants and policy implications

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Household catastrophic medical expenses in eastern China: determinants and policy implications
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-506
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaohong Li, Jay J Shen, Jun Lu, Ying Wang, Mei Sun, Chengyue Li, Fengshui Chang, Mo Hao

Abstract

Much of research on household catastrophic medical expenses in China has focused on less developed areas and little is known about this problem in more developed areas. This study aimed to analyse the incidence and determinants of catastrophic medical expenses in eastern China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Unspecified 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 17 23%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Social Sciences 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 11%
Unspecified 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,308,552
of 24,051,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,941
of 8,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,154
of 315,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#65
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,051,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.