↓ Skip to main content

The future of cytotoxic therapy: selective cytotoxicity based on biology is the key

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The future of cytotoxic therapy: selective cytotoxicity based on biology is the key
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, June 2003
DOI 10.1186/bcr597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johann S de Bono, Anthony W Tolcher, Eric K Rowinsky

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 9%
Unknown 29 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Chemistry 3 9%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#977
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,501
of 53,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.