↓ Skip to main content

A follow-up on patients with severe mental disorders in Sardinia after two changes in regional policies: poor resources still correlate with poor outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A follow-up on patients with severe mental disorders in Sardinia after two changes in regional policies: poor resources still correlate with poor outcomes
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauro Giovanni Carta, Matthias C Angermeyer, Federica Sancassiani, Francesco Tuligi, Roberto Pirastu, Anna Pisano, Elisa Pintus, Gisa Mellino, Mirra Pintus, Emanuele Pisanu, Maria Francesca Moro, Davide Massidda, Giuseppina Trincas, Dinesh Bhugra

Abstract

This survey followed a cohort of patients with chronic psychosis recruited from five catchment areas (DSMs) of the Sardinian community mental health services. The objective was to examine whether the amount of resources in the different sites may be a determinant of the outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Psychology 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,355,685
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,854
of 4,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,560
of 306,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#74
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.