↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery
Published in
BMC Surgery, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-13-s2-s12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Biondi, Giuseppe Grosso, Antonio Mistretta, Stefano Marventano, Chiara Toscano, Filippo Drago, Santi Gangi, Francesco Basile

Abstract

In the late '80s the successes of the laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease laid the foundations on the modern use of this surgical technique in a variety of diseases. In the last 20 years, laparoscopic colorectal surgery had become a popular treatment option for colorectal cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 78 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Engineering 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,236,404
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#424
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,238
of 222,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.