↓ Skip to main content

A longitudinal study of quality of life of earthquake survivors in L’Aquila, Italy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A longitudinal study of quality of life of earthquake survivors in L’Aquila, Italy
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Valenti, Francesco Masedu, Monica Mazza, Sergio Tiberti, Chiara Di Giovanni, Anna Calvarese, Roberta Pirro, Vittorio Sconci

Abstract

People's well-being after loss resulting from an earthquake is a concern in countries prone to natural disasters. Most studies on post-earthquake subjective quality of life (QOL) have focused on the effects of psychological impairment and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on the psychological dimension of QOL. However, there is a need for studies focusing on QOL in populations not affected by PTSD or psychological impairment. The aim of this study was to estimate QOL changes over an 18-month period in an adult population sample after the L'Aquila 2009 earthquake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Psychology 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,351,826
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,495
of 17,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,185
of 321,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#180
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.