↓ Skip to main content

Intersect between self-esteem and emotion regulation in narcissistic personality disorder - implications for alliance building and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intersect between self-esteem and emotion regulation in narcissistic personality disorder - implications for alliance building and treatment
Published in
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40479-017-0054-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elsa Ronningstam

Abstract

Building an alliance with patients with pathological narcissism or narcissistic personality disorder, NPD, can be challenging and include avoidance, negative reactivity and disruptions. A main contributing factor can be the complex interaction between emotion and self-esteem regulation, which affects patients' ability to engage in a therapeutic alliance and treatment. Recent studies, especially in neuroscience have identified functional characteristic and compromises in self-esteem and emotion regulation related to NPD. Self-enhancement, hyper reactivity and need for control, which patients within the range of disordered narcissism often present, can have different roots and underpinnings that require thorough exploration in the process of building the therapeutic alliance and promote change in treatment. Clinical examples with treatment implications and strategies will be discussed to highlight both internal fluctuations and external features and shifts in narcissistic personality functioning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 44 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 46 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,239,273
of 24,584,609 outputs
Outputs from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#112
of 208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,000
of 429,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,584,609 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.