You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Learning spatial orientation tasks in the radial-maze and structural variation in the hippocampus in inbred mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavioral and Brain Functions, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-9081-1-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wim E Crusio, Herbert Schwegler |
| Abstract |
In the present paper we review a series of experiments showing that heritable variations in the size of the hippocampal intra- and infrapyramidal mossy fiber (IIPMF) terminal fields correlate with performance in spatial, but not non-spatial radial-maze tasks. Experimental manipulation of the size of this projection by means of early postnatal hyperthyroidism produces the effects predicted from the correlations obtained with inbred mouse strains. Although the physiological mechanisms behind these correlations are unknown as yet, several lines of evidence indicate that these correlations are causal. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 25% |
| Researcher | 26 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 14% |
| Psychology | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,866,793
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#65
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,305
of 57,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them